Sovereignty
Sustainable finance

Industry and finance: towards an extra-financial data infrastructure

Extra-financial data is not a report to produce. It describes the real resilience of your company. In industry, those who understand this secure better financing. The others wait.

Temps de lecture estimé : X min

Illustration: extra-financial data as a lever to finance and insure industrial companies in the defense sector

Sommaire

Extra-financial data describes the robustness of the company

Treating extra-financial data as a reporting subject is a fundamental error. We work a lot with BITD players, and this shows how unsuitable this approach is for industrial companies.

Extra-financial data makes it possible to describe the way in which a company operates, resists and adapts in its environment.

Analyzing it is equivalent to qualifying:

Critical Dependencies and Exhibitions

  • Critical dependencies (suppliers, materials, technologies),
  • Geopolitical exhibitions,

Vulnerabilities and resilience capacities

  • Operational Vulnerabilities
  • security and continuity devices.

This information describes the real strength of the business.

Data that is still difficult to use

This information requires a structured data model to be used with confidence.

However, in many companies, this data is still mostly managed in Excel files, stored in non-sovereign environments and without a stable structure over time.

This results in a lack of a common data model, a duplication of information, a loss of traceability and an inability to reconstruct the history of decisions.

Applying finance standards to extra-financial matters

A financial system is based on:

  • a unique database,
  • Explicit Management Rules
  • and complete traceability.

This level of requirement now applies to extra-financial data. Because without this structure, data becomes:

  • unreliable,
  • Hard to share,
  • Expensive to produce,
  • Unusable for critical uses such as financing or insurance.

In BITD, an issue directly linked to financing

In BITD, this lag becomes structuring.

The work carried out by Sabine Lochmann within the Eurodefense-France working group shows that the central challenge lies in the readability of companies for financial actors: the information exists, but it is presented in a fragmented manner and remains difficult to interpret in a financing logic.

Key information:

  • positioning in the value chain,
  • critical dependencies,
  • risk concentration,
  • Resilience Capacity

Financing industrial sovereignty means making this data usable.

This is based on an infrastructure capable of defining a stable data model, of managing access rights, of ensuring the traceability of changes, of guaranteeing the sovereignty of the hosting and of exposing the data without duplicating it.